Published 28 Apr 2026

The Google Signals Update: and why it could quietly hurt your Marketing Performance.

Google is removing a privacy control many advertisers relied on. Here’s what changes on June 15 and what it reveals about your measurement setup.

What’s changing 

Before June 15: Two separate settings controlled whether your data flows into Google Ads: one inside Google Analytics (Google Signals), one signalled by your cookie banner via Consent Mode. Turning off Signals was a deliberate privacy measure many organizations relied on.

After June 15: Signals no longer controls advertising data. Your cookie banner, specifically the ad_storage setting, becomes the single lever. If a user consents to ad_storage, data flows to Google Ads.

What that means in practice: If you had Signals switched off as a privacy control, that protection disappears on June 15 2026. Whether data now flows to Google Ads depends entirely on how your cookie banner is configured, a setting many organizations have never fully audited.

What sounds like a minor update, isn’t!

On the surface, this looks straightforward: a setting disappears, one control replaces two, less confusion. Google describes it as cleaner governance, and at first glance, that reads as routine housekeeping.

But removing that setting forces every advertiser into a choice they may not have realized they were making.

Option 1: Allow ad data to flow and Google Ads performs well. 

Option 2: Restrict it and Google Ads loses the signals it needs to optimize: for bidding, for audiences, for attribution. Google’s own documentation is explicit about this: setting ad_storage to “denied” will “significantly impact advertising measurement.”

    Do you own your measurement, or does Google?

    The immediate actions are clear and necessary: audit your Consent Management Platform (CMP) configuration, verify how ad_storage is set across your markets, update your privacy disclosure before the deadline, and brief your legal team. These are non-negotiable.

    But underneath those operational tasks sits a more strategic question, one that this announcement is a useful prompt to ask, even if it predates the update itself:

    “If a platform we depend on changes its configuration, as Google just has, do we have an independent basis for understanding what actually drives our marketing results?”

    For organizations where measurement sits on a neutral layer, independent of any single platform’s logic, the June 15 2026 change requires attention but not alarm. The compliance tasks are real. The existential trade-off between performance and data control is not, because they have a view of what drives results that does not depend on what Google Ads can or cannot see.

    For organizations where that independent layer does not yet exist, this update is a timely reminder that platform-reported performance and actual marketing performance are not always the same thing. Every platform (e.g. Meta, Google, and others) measures its own results using its own logic and attribution windows. That is rational from their perspective, but it is not a sufficient basis for cross-channel budget decisions.

    Three things worth doing now

    • Audit your cookie banner configuration. Check how ad_storage is actually set across your markets, not how you assume it is. Many implementations were never revisited after go-live. This is the most urgent step before June 15.
    • Update your privacy disclosure. Google has given advertisers until mid-July to update their privacy disclosures. Brief your legal team now and confirm whether your current disclosures accurately reflect the new data flow.
    • Assess your measurement architecture. Map which of your channels are currently self-reporting their own performance and where you have a neutral, cross-channel view that sits outside any single platform’s logic. That assessment is valuable regardless of what Google announces next.

    Marketers who own their measurement don’t panic when Google changes a setting.

    They have an independent view of what drives performance – and why it shifts – they can validate what platform reports claim, and they make budget decisions based on evidence, not on whichever platform happened to take credit last.

    This change is a chance to ask whether your measurement setup gives you the confidence to steer your marketing independently of any single platform’s changes and updates.

    If you’d like to explore what that looks like in your setup, we’re happy to take a look together.